Appendix to item 15.1
Report for the 24th General Assembly
FIG Working Week in Seoul, 6-11 May 2001
REPORT ON THE FIG CO-OPERATION WITH INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS
General
FIG has organised its co-operation with international
organisations in two ways. An example of multilateral co-operation is the
co-operation with other professional surveying organisations (former IUSM) which
is now organised through informal meetings. Another example is the Habitat
Professionals Forum that is a coalition of professional associations that are
jointly together with UNCHS (Habitat) implementing the Habitat Agenda. The main
focus in FIG is, however, to increase bilateral co-operation formalised via
Memoranda of Understanding.
FIG has previously made memoranda of understanding with ICEC,
CIB and FIABCI in addition to the UN co-operation. After the General Assembly in
Prague FIG has signed a MoU with the International Society for Mine Surveying
(ISM) and prepared a similar agreement with the International Association of
Geodesy (IAG). Both these MoU forwarded to the General Assembly for adoption in
Seoul. FIG is prepared to make such bilateral agreements of co-operation also
with other professional associations firstly with ICA and ISPRS. Co-operation
with IHO will also be reviewed.
Joint Board of Surveying Societies
After the International Union for Surveying and Mapping (IUSM)
was dissolved in 1999, it was agreed that the international surveying and
mapping societies would meet in conjunction with the ISPRS 2000 meeting in
Amsterdam, Netherlands to discuss means for co-operation. Vice President Christian
Andreasen attended the meeting in August, 2000 on behalf of FIG. The meeting
was attended by representatives of ISPRS (International Society for
Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing), ICA (International Cartographic
Association), IAG (International Association of Geodesy), IHO (International
Hydrographic Organization), IGU (International Geographical Union) and FIG.
It was agreed that there would be no formal structure as was
attempted with IUSM nor will there be any dues. The societies agreed that formal
cooperation would be through bilateral arrangements. The societies are to
exchange journals between all Presidents and Secretaries General. Societies
agree to a "free license" for copying materials published in
newsletters. For publication articles, editors shall seek permission to reprint.
It has been proposed that the Presidents/Secretaries General meet annually in
conjunction with a meeting of the participating societies. Each society would be
responsible for its costs of attendance with two representatives accredited to
attend the Congress. The next meeting will be hosted by IAG in Budapest, Hungary
in September 2001. FIG has yet to decide if it will participate in the annual
meetings or if it may simply coordinate through bilateral arrangements. This
issue was preliminary discussed at the Bureau meeting in Providence in December
but the final decision has been postponed to Korea. FIG, however, will in any
case participate the next meeting in Budapest.
Habitat Professionals Forum
The Habitat Professionals Forum was established in 1999 and
put on the road as a repetitive phenomenon under the auspices of UNCHS (Habitat)
on the initiative of International Society of City and Regional Planners (IsoCaRP),
International Federation of Housing and Planning (IFHP), International Union of
Architects (UIA), FIG, Centre for African Settlement Studies and Development
CASSAD and Arabian Urban Development Institute AUDI. The Forum was organized
under the auspices of UNCHS (Habitat) with the enthusiastic support of Dr. Klaus
Töpfer, then Ag. Executive Director of UNCHS and presently United Nations
Under-Secretary-General and Director-General of the United Nations Office at
Nairobi and is now supported by Mrs. Anna K. Tibaijuka, the new Executive
Director of UNCHS (Habitat).
The forum is explicitly aimed at interchange between
professionals in the field and the government of the Habitat Centre. It
organises a direct orientation of the Forum towards the UN work. It monitors the
implementation of the Habitat Agenda. Professionals from different countries,
working directly for the improvement of urban living conditions, and influencing
decision making in their home situations, will be able to learn from each other
here, support each other and be given a common reference, to strengthen their
position. It should help the Habitat Agenda to follow the spontaneous and
autonomous dynamics in our societies through time and contribute to making it
really living instrument for progress.
The work of the Forum is managed through its Steering
Committee where FIG is represented by the Director, FIG office. The Steering
Committee meets annually once or twice. The latest meeting was held in January
2001 in The Hague. The main topic of this meeting was the arrangements for the
three parallel sessions that the Forum will organise in conjunction to the UN
Special Session on Istanbul+5 in New York in June 2001. The themes will be the
security of tenure, urban governance and financing. Prof. Holger Magel will
be the keynote speaker at the dialogue on the security of tenure and Robert
Foster will be the rapporteur at the same discussion. More information about
the Forum and activities during Istanbul+5 can be found on the Forum’s web
site www.habitatforum.org hosted by
FIG.
International Society for Mine Surveying (ISM)
At the Advisory Committee of Commission Officers (ACCO)
meeting in Prague it was agreed to proceed with a Memorandum of Understanding
with the International Society for Mine Surveying (ISM) and to prepare a draft
of agreement with the aim to sign it during the ISM Congress in Krakow in
September 2000, to which ISM invited the President to represent FIG.
When preparing the MoU it became obvious that there is lot of
issues where FIG has something to learn from ISM. In addition to various general
aspects of surveying at surface and underground levels, there are undoubtedly
specific techniques where ISM has developed special competence and experience in
this particular field. These could be of interest for other applications in
engineering surveys. Conversely, in addition to the existing links and
contributions (for instance via Prof. Adam Chrzanowski who is active in
both FIG and ISM working groups), special surveying and monitoring techniques
used in other engineering problems (including industrial and scientific
applications) might be of interest for ISM.
The MoU was agreed at the Presidium meeting of ISM 4
September 2000 and it was immediately signed by Prof. Jerzy Chwastek,
President of ISM, and Robert Foster, President of FIG. At the opening ceremony
of the Congress, President Foster was given the opportunity to give a welcome
address to the ISM colleagues, in which he expressed the natural motivations and
mutual benefits of this co-operation. Dr. Michel Mayoud, Chairman of
Commission 6, was also there for first technical contacts. He has also been
attending the ISM congress and was appointed later by the Bureau as the FIG
focal point for the contacts with ISM.
International Association of Geodesy (IAG)
Already before IUSM was disbanded FIG decided to develop
bilateral agreements of co-operation with the former IUSM members and other
sister associations. This principle was confirmed again by the FIG General
Assembly and the FIG Bureau in Prague in May 2000.
At the FIG Advisory Committee of Commission Officers (ACCO)
meeting the procedure and priority list of these agreements was discussed and
agreed in Prague in May 2000. The Commission officers considered the Memoranda
of Understanding to be important and most often the International Association of
Geodesy (IAG) was mentioned to be the first that the formal agreement of
co-operation should be signed with.
In FIG the role of IAG has been described as scientific
organisation while FIG more as a link between the scientists and practitioners.
Experience show that many active people in the field of geodesy are active both
in IAG and in FIG. Annually there are several events that are organised and
co-sponsored by both associations or their working groups.
The MoU is prepared to confirm this co-operation and develop
it forward as well as record some principles on the co-operation. The MoU is
divided into a long-term co-operation agreement and to action list that will be
updated in discussions between the Secretary General of IAG and the Director,
FIG office. More information about IAG is available on web site: http://www.gfy.ku.dk/~iag/.
The draft MoU was prepared in early March and agreed to be
forwarded for adoption of the both organisations during spring 2001.
International Cost Engineering Council (ICEC)
The co-operation between FIG and ICEC is mainly organised
through the ad hoc Commission on construction economics. In addition FIG and
ICEC are starting their co-operation with UNCHS (Habitat) in affordable housing
for the very poor settlements in Africa.
International Research Council for Building Studies and
Documentation (CIB)
Based on the Memorandum of Understanding between FIG and
International Research Council for Building Studies and Documentation (CIB) the
associations have started a joint project to identify performance indicators for
urban sustainability. The two co-ordinators of the project are Stephen Brown
from RICS (UK) and Prof. Peter Dale from FIG, who are now looking for
interested persons to participate into the project.
The overall objective of the working group is to help bring
about a common understanding, acceptance and use among all parties to the urban
development process as to the appropriate performance indicators to be used for
assessing and measuring urban sustainability. These shall be considered in the
context of national, regional, local, organisation and project levels.
In this context, it is viewed as being of particular
importance to encourage and facilitate effective communication between and
within the different levels of decision-making, from the policy level to the
operational level.
The project will have the following output: Summary report of
findings related to The Benchmark of current practices (2001); Draft
specification of desirable set of performance indicators (two sets – one for
change, one for performance) (2002); Report of findings on Identification of
barriers/values/drivers/etc for change (2002); and Final Report on Best practice
guidelines and presentation at Conferences (2003).
FIG Office
6 March 2001
|